Submission Guidelines
Paper submissions should be no longer than 10 pages, in the IEEE 2-column format, including the bibliography and any possible appendices. Submissions longer than 10 pages will be rejected without a review. All submissions will be triple-blind reviewed by the Program Committee on the basis of technical quality, relevance to data mining, originality, significance, and clarity. The following sections give further information for authors.
1. Triple blind submission guidelines
ICBK will adopt a triple blind submission and review policy for all submissions. Authors must hence not use identifying information in the text of the paper and bibliographies must be referenced to preserve anonymity.
2. What is triple blind reviewing?
The traditional blind paper submission hides the referee name from the authors. The triple-blind paper submission and review, in addition, also hides the authors¡¯ names from the referees, and the referees¡¯ names during discussion. The names of authors and referees remain known only to the PC co-chairs, and the authors names are disclosed only after the ranking and acceptance of submissions are finalized. Although there is much debate on the merits and perceived benefits of triple blind reviewing, these are not discussed here. Our main purpose is to implement this policy in ICBK toward understanding the influence of the authors¡¯ identity, whether conscious or unconscious, on the reviewer¡¯s attitude toward a submission. Hence it is imperative that all authors of ICBK submissions work on concealing their identity in the content of the paper. It does not suffice to simply remove the authors¡¯ names from the first page.
3. How to prepare your submissions
The authors shall omit their names from the submission. For formatting templates with author and institution information, simply replace all these information in the template by ¡°Anonymous¡±.
In the submission, the authors¡¯ should refer to their own prior work like the prior work of any other author, and include all relevant citations. This can be done either by referring to their prior work in the third person or referencing papers generically. For example, if your name is Jack and you have worked on classification, instead of saying ¡°We extend our earlier classification model (Jack 2010),¡± you may say ¡°We extend Jack¡¯s (Jack 2010) earlier classification model.¡±
The authors shall exclude citations to their own work which is not fundamental to understanding the paper, including prior versions (e.g., technical reports, unpublished internal documents) of the submitted paper. They should reference only necessary work using point (2). Hence, do not write: ¡°In our previous work [5]¡± as it reveals that citation 5 is written by the current authors.
The authors shall remove mention of funding sources, personal acknowledgments, and other such auxiliary information that could be related to their identities. These can be reinstituted in the camera-ready copy once the paper is accepted for publication.
The authors shall make statements on well-known or unique systems that identify an author, as vague in respect to identifying the authors as possible.
The submitted files shall be named with care to ensure that authors¡¯ anonymity is not compromised by the file name. E.g., do not name your submission ¡°.pdf¡±, instead give it a name that is descriptive of the title of your paper, such as ¡°A New Approach for Classfication.pdf¡± (or a shorter version of the same).
Accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings by the [Insert the press].
All manuscripts are submitted as full papers and are reviewed based on their scientific merit. The reviewing process is confidential. There is no separate abstract submission step. There are no separate industrial, application, short paper or poster tracks. Manuscripts must be submitted electronically in online submission system. We do not accept email submissions.